WEBVTT

00:00:06.471 --> 00:00:07.393
Hey, Matt...

00:00:07.416 --> 00:00:08.633
check it out.

00:00:10.242 --> 00:00:11.581
Whaddaya think?

00:00:11.777 --> 00:00:13.147
I think she's gonna find out

00:00:13.157 --> 00:00:14.733
- who's doing this.
- Oh. No. No. No...

00:00:14.764 --> 00:00:16.257
I got a guy down in IT.

00:00:16.318 --> 00:00:18.798
I send this to him...
he forwards it anonymously

00:00:18.818 --> 00:00:19.856
and it's all good!

00:00:19.924 --> 00:00:22.415
We've been doing it for like
three weeks now... so...

00:00:22.631 --> 00:00:25.319
- That's pretty good.
- It is, isn't it?

00:00:25.374 --> 00:00:27.555
Alright... let's send
this little greeting...

00:00:27.624 --> 00:00:29.501
on its merry way, huh?

00:00:32.830 --> 00:00:34.810
From the comments
made in this example,

00:00:34.820 --> 00:00:36.953
it's clear that the alteration
of pictures

00:00:36.963 --> 00:00:38.994
has been going on for some time -

00:00:39.005 --> 00:00:41.425
and that they've been
widely distributed.

00:00:41.688 --> 00:00:44.322
This example provides
an important lesson.

00:00:44.372 --> 00:00:47.177
The picture sent to the coworker
wasn't a centerfold...

00:00:47.246 --> 00:00:49.455
or anything sexually explicit.

00:00:49.617 --> 00:00:51.586
However, liability for harassment

00:00:51.597 --> 00:00:55.267
doesn't depend on whether the conduct
is sexual in nature or not.

00:00:55.590 --> 00:00:56.767
The issue is...

00:00:56.778 --> 00:00:59.582
are women being treated
differently than men?

00:00:59.691 --> 00:01:02.136
If women are the only ones
receiving the pictures,

00:01:02.147 --> 00:01:04.790
then the behavior is not
only unprofessional,

00:01:04.800 --> 00:01:07.194
but it may also be
considered harassment...

00:01:07.204 --> 00:01:09.189
and discrimination.