﻿WEBVTT

00:00:05.160 --> 00:00:06.790
This remote is tricky.

00:00:06.857 --> 00:00:09.759
What I try to do is take the back
of the battery pack off and

00:00:09.788 --> 00:00:11.494
move the batteries around a little.

00:00:12.972 --> 00:00:15.150
I don't know why it seems to work.

00:00:15.909 --> 00:00:17.306
Thanks, Elizabeth.

00:00:17.768 --> 00:00:20.587
I guess you are an expert on
things that take batteries, huh?

00:00:21.472 --> 00:00:23.556
I wouldn't say that.

00:00:23.634 --> 00:00:26.228
I would. I mean,
the whole world knows.

00:00:27.456 --> 00:00:29.822
Didn't you do a little "shopping"
with your friends?

00:00:29.902 --> 00:00:31.902
You even posted it online...

00:00:32.537 --> 00:00:35.165
Yeah... I didn't know
you followed me.

00:00:35.206 --> 00:00:38.759
Didn't you refer to some unmentionable
items one of your friends brought back?

00:00:38.840 --> 00:00:40.947
- Yes... but...
- I think we all know what that means.

00:00:41.050 --> 00:00:43.431
- I wasn't saying that I'm...
- Don't be shy!

00:00:43.481 --> 00:00:46.181
You said it online.
You can say it here, right?

00:00:47.127 --> 00:00:48.290
Look,

00:00:48.300 --> 00:00:50.681
if you are going to be successful
here, you need to remember

00:00:50.692 --> 00:00:53.775
that you represent this
company and our clients!

00:00:53.941 --> 00:00:56.159
You can't do that if you make a
habit out of being careless

00:00:56.170 --> 00:00:59.628
and mentioning things online
that should be ... unmentionable.

00:00:59.788 --> 00:01:02.394
Your recent online postings speaks
volumes about your character.

00:01:02.435 --> 00:01:05.175
And because of that, you've put
our company in jeopardy.

00:01:05.326 --> 00:01:09.081
I feel about two inches tall
when she does that to me...

00:01:09.144 --> 00:01:11.347
and this is not the first time.

00:01:11.590 --> 00:01:14.019
She seems to have it out for me.

00:01:14.107 --> 00:01:19.019
She took something completely innocent
and then she made me look bad,

00:01:19.148 --> 00:01:21.148
like I was being reckless
on the internet...

00:01:21.251 --> 00:01:23.251
like it was a work thing.

00:01:23.370 --> 00:01:25.956
And she did it in front of everyone.

00:01:26.107 --> 00:01:28.534
And no one said anything.

00:01:29.059 --> 00:01:32.300
I guess, they're afraid that
she'll single them out, too.

00:01:34.154 --> 00:01:35.972
I won't be in tomorrow.

00:01:37.997 --> 00:01:41.847
I hate to say it, but you can see
why Elizabeth isn't a good fit here.

00:01:41.990 --> 00:01:43.315
I just don't like her.

00:01:43.371 --> 00:01:46.300
I mean look at her.
She doesn't take things seriously.

00:01:46.375 --> 00:01:47.284
And if she can't do that,

00:01:47.322 --> 00:01:50.753
sometimes it helps to show someone
the door and send a strong message.

00:01:50.950 --> 00:01:54.597
When a person in a position
of power decides to target an employee,

00:01:54.710 --> 00:01:57.427
they are often hurtful
and clearly inappropriate -

00:01:57.438 --> 00:01:59.269
just like a schoolyard bully.

00:01:59.403 --> 00:02:03.831
This is compounded by the situations
where the bully is also the boss.

00:02:04.006 --> 00:02:06.972
But the situation can
and should be addressed.

00:02:07.122 --> 00:02:09.714
Like other bullies,
a boss who's out of control

00:02:09.725 --> 00:02:12.722
needs to be reminded
when they cross the line.

00:02:13.247 --> 00:02:16.175
Mary, I don't think that's fair.

00:02:16.216 --> 00:02:17.206
What's not?

00:02:17.247 --> 00:02:20.925
- Coming down on Elizabeth like that...
- This kind of thing is important.

00:02:21.059 --> 00:02:24.347
Okay... the last time I checked
our HR handbook,

00:02:24.357 --> 00:02:26.909
we should be looking
at things that are job-related...

00:02:26.919 --> 00:02:29.190
not what we do in our personal lives.

00:02:29.294 --> 00:02:32.307
I have to agree with John,

00:02:32.318 --> 00:02:36.065
and why would you want to do this
in front of everyone?

00:02:36.278 --> 00:02:37.534
What am I hearing?

00:02:37.575 --> 00:02:42.706
Look... if there really was an issue,
don't you think it makes sense to

00:02:42.741 --> 00:02:48.081
either talk with a person individually
about it or in a group setting, but...

00:02:48.138 --> 00:02:50.690
one person isn't used as the example?

00:02:50.746 --> 00:02:54.144
Well, what she did was careless,
and I don't understand her type...

00:02:54.185 --> 00:02:56.519
Her type? Really?

00:02:56.841 --> 00:02:57.831
Okay, look.

00:02:57.888 --> 00:03:01.128
If there's an issue with the group,
then we should discuss it together.

00:03:01.178 --> 00:03:03.550
But if it's with one person,

00:03:03.862 --> 00:03:06.894
I think that should be handled
one- on- one.

00:03:07.341 --> 00:03:08.831
Right Mary?

00:03:09.887 --> 00:03:11.019
Fine.

00:03:11.216 --> 00:03:13.097
I'll keep that in mind.

00:03:13.788 --> 00:03:16.409
Let's get started on our
new fiscal budget.

